Para uma crítica macintyreana da filosofia analítica

Alberto Leopoldo Batista Neto

doi:10.26694/pensando.v6i11.3583

Para uma crítica macintyreana da filosofia analítica

Alberto Leopoldo Batista Neto

Resumo

A filosofia analítica constitui uma das mais importantes tradições filosóficas do século XX. Porém, a ausência de acordos sobre princípios e teses em comum acaba prejudicando a compreensão de sua identidade e a alegação, comum entre seus representantes, de constituir uma forma superior de racionalidade. O projeto filosófico de Alasdair MacIntyre permite aprofundar essa crítica.

Palavras-chave

Filosofia Analítica, Metafilosofia, Racionalidade, Alasdair MacIntyre, Virada Linguística, Lógica, Liberalismo

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências

AKEHURST, Thomas. The Cultural Politics of Analytic Philosophy: Britishness and the Spectre of Europe. London, New York: Continuum, 2010.

ARDLEY, Gavin. Aquinas and Kant: The Foundations of Modern Science. London, New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green & Co., 1950.

BATISTA NETO, Alberto Leopoldo. Representação e combinação de lógicas: Questões conceituais. Dissertação de Mestrado: Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Campinas, 2007.

BEALL, J. C.; RESTALL, Greg. Logical pluralism. Oxford: Clarendon, 2006.

BÉZIAU, Jean-Yves. The relativity and universality of logic. Synthese. DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0419-0, 20 March 2014.

BROADIE, Alexander. Introduction to Medieval Logic. 2. ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.

COFFA, J. Alberto. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: to the Vienna station. Melbourne: Cambridge, 1991.

COSTA, Newton C. A. da. Ensaio sobre os Fundamentos da Lógica. 2. ed. São Paulo: HUCITEC, EDUSP, 1980.

CRITCHLEY, Simon. Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University, 2001.

DUMMETT, Michael. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1991.

_____. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Duckworth; Cambridge: Harvard University, 1993.

_____. Truth. In: _____. Truth and Other Enigmas. Harvard University, 1978, pp 1-24.

EPSTEIN, Richard. Propositional logics: The Semantic Foundations of Logic. 3. ed. Socorro (NM): ARF, 2012.

FESER, Edward. Philosophy of mind: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: Oneworld, 2006.

_____. Locke. Oxford: Oneworld, 2007.

_____. Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae, 2014.

FOLLESDAL, Dagfinn. Analytic Philosophy: What Is It and Why Should One Engage in It? In: GLOCK, Hans-Johann. The Rise of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.

GILSON, Etienne. El realismo metódico. Trad. Valentín García Yebra. 4. ed. Madrid: Rialp, 1974.

_____. Thomist Realism and the Critique of Knowledge. Trad. Mark A. Wauck. San Francisco: Ignatius, 1983.

GLOCK, Hans-Johann. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. New York: Cambridge University, 2003.

_____. What is Analytical Philosophy? New York: Cambridge University, 2008.

GRATTAN-GUINNESS, Ivor. The Mathematical Turns in Logic. In: GABBAY, Dov M.; WOODS, John (Eds.). The Rise of Modern Logic from Leibniz to Frege: Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2004.

HACKER, P. M. S. Analytic philosophy: what, whence, and whither? In: BILETZKI, Anat; MATAR, Anat (Eds.). The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes. New York: Routledge, 1998.

_____. Analytic philosophy: beyond the linguistic turn and back again. In: BEANEY, Michael (Ed.) The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. New York: Routley, 2007, pp. 125-141.

HALDANE, John. (Ed.). Mind, Metaphysics, and Value in the Thomistic and Analytical Traditions. Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 2002.

_____. The Breakdown of Contemporary Philosophy of Mind. In: _____, 2002, p. 54-75. (2002a)

HEIJENOORT, Jean Van. Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language. Synthese (1967) 324-330. D. Reidel. Dordrecht.

KAUFFMANN. The Hegel Myth and Its Method. In: MACINTYRE, 1976.

KLIMA, Gyula. Contemporary “Essentialism” vs. Aristotelian Essentialism. In: HALDANE, 2002.

_____. Existence and reference in medieval logic. In: HIEKE, Alexander; MORSHER, Edgar. (Eds.) New Essays in Free logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001, p. 197-226.

_____. On Kenny on Aquinas on Being. International Philosophical Quaterly. 44 (4): 567-580 (2004).

KNEALE, William; KNEALE, Martha. The Development of Logic. London: Oxford

(Clarendon), 1971.

KRETZMANN, Norman; KENNY, Anthony; PINBORG, Jan; STUMP, Eleonore (Eds.). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Melbourne: Cambridge, 1982.

LEWIS, David. Philosophical Papers: Volume I. New York, Oxford: Oxford University, 1983 (Introduction)

MACINTYRE, Alasdair (Ed.). Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame, 1976.b

____. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 1988.

_____. Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition. Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 1990a.

_____. First Principles, Final Ends and Contemporary Philosophical Issues. Milwaukee: Marquette University, 1990b (Aquinas Lecture).

_____. The Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays, Volume I. New York: Cambridge University, 2006.

_____. Moral relativism, truth and justification. In: MACINTYRE, 2006, pp. 52-73. (2006a)

_____. Moral philosophy and contemporary social practice: what holds them apart? In: MACINTYRE, 2006, pp. 104-122. (2006b)

_____. Philosophy recalled to its tasks: a Thomistic reading of Fides et Ratio. In: MACINTYRE, 2006, pp.179-196. (2006c)

_____. Truth as a good: a reflection on Fides et Ratio. In: MACINTYRE, 2006, pp. 197-215.

_____. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 3. ed. Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 2007.

_____. On Not Knowing Where You Are Going. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 84, No. 2(November 2010), pp. 61-74.

MANCOSU, Paolo. Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. New York, Oxford: Oxford University, 1996.

MARITAIN, Jacques. Distinguer pour Unir ou les Degrés Du Savoir. 4. ed. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1947.

_____. A Filosofia da Natureza. Tr. Luiz Paulo Rouanet. São Paulo: Loyola, 2003.

MICHELETTI, Mario. Tomismo analítico. Trad. Benôni Lemos, Patrizia Collina Bastianeto. Aparecida (SP): Ideias & Letras, 2009.

O’CALLAGHAN, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: toward a more perfect form of existence. Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 2003.

ODERBERG, David. Real Essentialism. New York, London: Routledge, 2007.

PRESTON, Aaron. Analytical Philosophy: The History of an Illusion. London, New York: Continuum, 2010.

PRIEST, Graham. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. 2. ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 2006.

QUINE, W. V. Two dogmas of empiricism. In.: _____. From a Logical Point of View. New York, Evanston: Harvard University, Harper & Row, 1963.

RORTY, Richard M. (Ed.) The Linguistic Turn: essays on philosophical method. Chicago, London: University of Chicago, 1992.

SCRUTON, Roger. Breve História da Filosofia Moderna: De Descartes a Wittgenstein. Trad. Eduardo Francisco Alves. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 2008.

SILVA, Jairo José da. Filosofias da Matemática. São Paulo: UNESP, 2007.

SLUGA, Hans. What Has History to Do with Me? Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy. Inquiry, 41, 99-121 (1997).

SOAMES, Scott. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century: Volume I: The Dawn of Analysis. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University, 2003.

SORELL, Tom; ROGERS, G. A. J. (Eds.). Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005.

TARSKI, Alfred. Sobre o Conceito de Consequência Lógica. Trad. Celso R. Braida. In: MORTARI, Cezar Augusto; DUTRA, Luiz Henrique de Araújo (Orgs.). A Concepção Semântica da Verdade: Textos Clássicos de Tarski. São Paulo: UNESP, 2007.

WHITEHEAD, Alfred North. A ciência e o mundo moderno. Trad. Hermann Herbert Watzlawick. São Paulo: Paulus, 2006.

WILLIAMSON, Timothy. Past the Linguistic Turn? In: LEITER, Brian. The Future for Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 2004, pp. 106-128.

WOODS, John. Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences. Edinburgh, New York: Cambridge University, 2003.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26694/pensando.v6i11.3583

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.26694/pensando.v6i11.3583.g2235

Direitos autorais 2015 Pensando - Revista de Filosofia