Evidências na prática do cateterismo urinário: Revisão Integrativa

Mayron Morais Almeida, Francisco Wharleson Torres, Ângela Maria Lindoso, Rosalba Maria da Costa Pessôa

Resumo


Objective: to discuss from the national and international scientific production the best evidence related to urinary catheterization technique in preventing urinary tract infection. Method: integrative descriptive review, in order to answer the main question: what are the best evidence available in the literature related to urinary catheterization technique? Selected bases were LILACS, SciELO and Cochrane. Results: 242 articles were found in the Cochrane Library, 81 articles on LILACS and 49 in SciELO base, adding to 372 articles. Of these, 10 articles were analyzed that met the previously established inclusion criteria. Conclusion: in search of the best available evidence, for the efficient nursing interventions for the prevention of urinary tract infections, it is understood that taking the nurse's decision on the use of devices should be carried out based on detailed and individualized assessment for every patient.

 


Palavras-chave


Descritores: Cateterismo Urinário; Infecções Urinárias; Enfermagem Baseada em Evidências.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Canada. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Hydrophilic catheters: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 6(9). Available form: http://www.hqontario.ca/english/providers/program/mas/tech/reviews/pdf/rev_hydrocat_030106.pdf.

Queirós MI, Cipriano MAB, Santos MCL, Cardoso MVLML. Rev. Rene [Internet]. Fortaleza, 2011 abr/jun [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 12(2):295-301. Available form: http://www.revistarene.ufc.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/download/156/67.

Campos CVS, Silva KL. Cateterismo vesical intermitente realizado pelos cuidadores domiciliares em um serviço de atenção domiciliar. Rev. Mineira Enferm. [Internet]. 2013 ut/dez [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 17(4): 753-762. Available form: http://www.reme.org.br/exportar-pdf/885/v17n4a02.pdf.

Ercole FF, Macieira TGR, Wenceslau LCC, Martins AR, Campos CC, CHIANCA TCM. Revisão integrativa: evidências na prática do cateterismo urinário intermitente/demora. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2013 jan-fev [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 21(1): 10. Available form: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v21n1/pt_v21n1a23.pdf.

Galvão CM, Sawada NO, Trevizan MA. Revisão sistemática: recurso que proporciona a incorporação das evidências na prática da enfermagem. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 12(3):549-56. Available form: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v12n3/v12n3a14.pdf.

Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 8(1):102-6. Available form: http://www.astresmetodologias.com/material/O_que_e_RIL.pdf.

Ursi, ES. Prevenção das lesões de pele no perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. [Dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2015 Nov 10]. Available form: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/22/22132/tde-18072005-095456/publico/URSI_ES.pdf.

Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine - Levels of evidence [Internet]. 2009 March [cited 2015 Nov 10]; Grades of recommendation. Available form: http://www.huwc.ufc.br/nats/download/pdf_0f83835a321d9c67de14d41b4c784d01.pdf.

Kringel U, Reimer T, Tomczak S, Green S, Kundt G, Gerber B. Postoperative infections due to bladder catheters after anterior colporrhaphy: a prospective, randomized threearm study. International urogynecology journal [Internet]. 2010 Dec [cited 2015 Nov 10] 21(12): 1499-504. Available form: http://cochrane.bvsalud.org/doc.php?db=central&lib=COC&id=CN-00777894.

Reyes SVF, Castellanos MRP, Rodríguez ZN, Veranes FNL, Fernández ZR. Infección del tracto urinario por uso del catéter vesical en pacientes ingresados en cuidados intensivos. MEDISAN [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 18(11):1524. Available form: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/san/v18n11/san061811.pdf.

Oliveira LC, Lucon AM, Ianhez WC, Nahas LE. Arap, Sami. Catheter-associated urinary infection in kidney post-transplant patients. Sao Paulo Med J/Rev Paul Med [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 119(5):165-8. Available form: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/spmj/v119n5/6667.pdf.

Csharifi SHH, Mokarrar MH, Yamini-Sharif FKR, Lashay A, Soltani MH. Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention? Int. Braz J Urol [Internet]. 2014 jun [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 40(3) Available form: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ibju/v40n3/1677-5538-ibju-40-3-0373.pdf.

Souza Neto JL. Infecção do trato urinário relacionada com a utilização do cateter vesical de demora: resultados da bacteriúria e da microbiota estudadas. Rev. Col. Bras [Internet]. 2008 Jan-Fev [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 35(1). Available form: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rcbc/v35n1/v35n1a08.pdf.

Weemhoff M, Wassen MM, Korsten L, Serroyen J, Kampschöer PH, Roumen FJ. Postoperative catheterization after anterior colporrhaphy: 2 versus 5 days. A multicenter randomized control led trial. International urogynecology journal [Internet]. 2011 Apr [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 22(4): 47783. Available form: http://cochrane.bvsalud.org/doc.php?db=central&lib=COC&id=CN-00786753.

Souto CAV, Rhodes EL, Conti R, Chamma Jr M, Last SE, Fornari A, Ribeiro EP, Scholl L, Teloken C, Souto JCS. URETHRAL CATHETER REMOVAL 7 OR 14 DAYS AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY: clinical implications and complications in a randomized study. rev. hosp. clín. fac. med [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 59(5):262-265, Available form: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rhc/v59n5/v59n5a07.pdf.

Kamilya G, Seal SL, Mukherji J, Bhattacharyya SK, Hazra A. A randomized controlled trial comparing short versus longterm catheterization after uncomplicated vaginal prolapse surgery. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research [Internet]. 2010 Feb [cited 2015 Nov 10]; 36(1): 1548. Available form: http://cochrane.bvsalud.org/doc.php?db=central&lib=COC&id=CN-00750767.

Méndez E, Benigno El. Recolector de orina: ¿Es un método confiable de recolección aséptica?. Rev. chil. pediatr [Internet]. 2003 Set[cited 2015 Nov 10]; 74(5): 487-491. Available form: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0370-41062003000500004&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=es.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26694/repis.v1i4.4437

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bases/Indexadores:

Internacionais: Cuiden; Index Copernicus International; Research Bible; Latindex; CrossRef; Scholar Google; REDIB; PKP Index; DOAJ; MIAR; Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS); BDEnf.

Nacionais: Diadorim; IBICT; Sumarios.org; LIVRE; periodicos CAPES.

REPIS is available in: Publons

ISSN: 2446-7901